WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU! 📧 CONFIDENTIAL REPORTING
🚨EMAIL US ORCHARDHEIGHTSOVERSIGHT@GMAIL.COM
🚨EMAIL US ORCHARDHEIGHTSOVERSIGHT@GMAIL.COM


Instead of legal fees to fight oversight:
✓ Independent financial audit of vendor relationships ✓ Repairs to property (pavement, drainage, etc.) ✓ Reserve fund contribution ✓ Competitive bids for landscaping contract ✓ Professional property assessment ✓ Security camera system ✓ Tree trimming/removal ✓ Literally ANY actual property improvement

. Step 1: Rush $1.1M assessment (10 days notice) Step 2: Hide results for 17 days Step 3: Vote fails Step 4: Blame residents Step 5: Spend $2,000+ threatening oversight Step 6: Call transparency "false information" Step 7: Label questioners "deceitful" THIS IS NOT LEADERSHIP. THIS IS INTIMIDATION.

✓ Everything here = facts + questions ✓ Jo cites ZERO specific false statements ✓ She spent $2,000+ in legal fees fighting oversight

From Jo Mustaro's own letter to residents: "This type of activity is having an adverse effect in our community. It's costing all of us additional expenses in legal fees (in excess of $2000 so far)" READ THAT AGAIN: Jo Mustaro spent over $2,000 of YOUR money Not to answer questions Not to provide transparency Not to improve the property TO SILENCE RESIDENTS WHO ASK QUESTIONS.

$83,000 → Single vendor (landscaping/snow) $2,000+ → Legal fees fighting residents $500 → Brick-in-toilet advice brochure $0 → Pavement repairs $0 → Answering residents' questions

"Why does one vendor receive $83,000/year?" - "When was this contract last competitively bid?" - "Why is this $50,000/year above industry standard?" - "Where is the documentation of competitive bidding?" - "Does this represent the best value for residents?" - "Could better financial oversight have saved $1 million over 20 years?"

📊 2025 OPERATING BUDGET ANALYSIS The board provided residents with the 2025 operating budget. We're posting it here so all unit owners can review how $385,346 in assessments will be spent.

LANDSCAPING: $33,000 MISC. LANDSCAPING: $20,000 SNOW REMOVAL: $30,000 ─ TOTAL TO ONE VENDOR: $83,000

LARGEST EXPENSES: 🌱 Landscaping: $33,000 (8.6% of budget) → More than property management ($24,000) → More than water & fire service ($24,000) → More than electric ($20,000) → 33x more than snow removal ($1,000) → $379 per unit annually → When was this competitively bid?

🚨 WHERE IS THE CONTRACTOR? JUAN CALDERON - NEW ENGLAND ROOFING OWNER $1.1 MILLION PROJECT - NO SHOWS TO MEETINGS At our October 14 resident meeting, the representative from New England Roofing attended but was unable and unwilling to answer basic questions about the company's experience: She said the questions were "irrelevant".

DENNIS DEMEGLIO Unique Property Management - Owns management company - Selects contractors - Chose $1M option, dismissed $900K option - $100K wasted = $1,149 per unit

JO Mustaro Board President - Approved higher price - Ignored savings - Won't answer questions - Rushing 10-day vote on $1.1M QUESTIONS THEY WON'T ANSWER: ❓ What's Dennis's relationship with the contractor? ❓ Why did Jo approve paying $100K MORE? ❓ Where are conflict of interest disclosures? ❓ Who benefits from the higher price?

The property manager selecting contractors OWNS the management company. Zero accountability.
KP Lamarco's $900,000 quote saves $100,000 - Board's response: "Thank you" and nothing more
Why does Dennis Demeglio keep pushing this specific contractor while hiding information and ignoring alternatives?

1. Vote NO and complete your ballot
2. Photograph your completed ballot
3. Email photo to orchardheightsoversight@gmail.com
4. Mail your ballot with tracking and return receipt, or hand deliver and request a written receipt.
We're creating an independent count to verify honest ballot counting.
Your photo stays confidential - only totals are published.
Independent count of ballots reported by residents
We DO NOT publish unit numbers or names.
Only the anonymous total count is displayed.
Your ballot photo is kept confidential and used only to verify the board's count.
No one will know how you voted except you and our trusted oversight team.
STEP 1: Vote NOComplete your ballot and mark "NO" on the proposal
STEP 2: Take a PhotoPhotograph your completed ballot before mailing it
STEP 3: Email UsSend your ballot photo to: orchardheightsoversight@gmail.com
STEP 4: Mail Your BallotSend your ballot via U.S. Mail with tracking OR hand-deliver with signed receipt
We're creating an independent count to verify the board counts ballots honestly. If there's a discrepancy between our count and their count, we'll have evidence. Your privacy is protected while ensuring accountability.
From your concerned neighbors at Orchard Heights Oversight Fighting for transparency and responsible spending
The board admitted at the September 30th meeting that only TWO contractors were asked to quote this project. No competitive bidding process. No comparison of multiple qualified siding specialists. Dennis Demeglio obtained Just Two quotes - and they selected a roofing company with no track record of large projects over a siding specialist. Why do they want to use New England Roofing?
The board obtained only TWO quotes. We found a third option that's better AND cheaper.
CONTRACTOR COMPARISON: WHO SHOULD GET YOUR $1 MILLION?
NEW ENGLAND ROOFING
Specialization:Roofing Company
Years in Business:8 years
Workforce:Subcontractors
Large Project Experience:No public permits over $100K
Recommended By:Property Manager Dennis D'Meglio
$1,000,000
KP LAMARCO
Specialization:Siding Specialists
Years in Business:25 years
Workforce:Full-Time Employees
Large Project Experience:Multiple large residential projects
Recommended By:Concerned Residents
$900,000
l
l
Should non-residents control resident lives?• Is it ethical for rental property owners to vote on projects affecting daily living? • Should part-time residents make decisions about full-time community life? • How can board members represent residents when they don't share the experience?
Where's the accountability?• 20 years of board control with no consequences for poor planning • Decision makers insulated from the results of their choices • No mechanism to protect full-time residents from absentee board control

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.